Correct the name, but keep identification open
The archived title spells the name “Crossostephium sinesis.” The plant name listed by Kew is Crossostephium chinense (L.) Makino, treated there as a synonym of Artemisia chinensis L. The old article appears to refer to this taxon, but the historical photograph and plant itself have not been independently checked. A taxonomy database can clarify names; it cannot confirm that a particular bonsai was correctly identified.
Until the image and source plant are verified, use both names with attribution and describe the identification as provisional. This matters because advice developed for a woody temperate bonsai cannot automatically be transferred to a subshrub with different growth and seasonal behavior.
What the old case actually reports
The recovered text says the specimen grew quickly and that its trunk increased in diameter. It does not document dates, measurements, climate, container, substrate, watering, pruning history or overwintering conditions. Those observations are worth preserving as a historical case, but they do not establish a typical growth rate or a repeatable technique.
The page’s practical value depends on an author follow-up: Is the plant still alive? Was it identified from a botanical source? What dimensions were measured, over what period, and under which conditions? Without those answers, a reader should not use the article as a care calendar.
How to evaluate unusual bonsai material
- Confirm the name with a reliable taxonomic reference and a knowledgeable grower.
- Record the original source, location and date if known.
- Document light, temperature, container, substrate and growth over time.
- Test pruning or root work conservatively, with recovery observations.
- Separate what was directly observed from what is inferred.
Unusual material can expand what growers consider possible. The responsible claim is not “this species is easy” or “this method works”; it is a clear account of one specimen, its conditions and what remains unknown.
This historical record does not establish plant identity or dated cultivation observations. No species-specific instruction is inferred from the image.
Sources and further reading
- Crossostephium chinense — Plants of the World Online, KewKew lists this scientific name as a synonym of Artemisia chinensis.
- Artemisia chinensis — Plants of the World Online, KewTaxonomic record for the accepted name used by POWO.